GDPR · Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Article 41
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this article.
Article total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
All Commission’s changes to GDPRThe wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Alternative wording Amendment 1294 · François-Xavier Bellamy ITRE · LIBE
against:
Article 41
Monitoring of approved codes of conduct
- 1.
Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority under Articles 57 and 58, the monitoring of compliance with a code of conduct pursuant to Article 40 may be carried out by a body which has an appropriate level of expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code and is accredited for that purpose by the competent supervisory authority.
- 2.
A body as referred to in paragraph 1 may be accredited to monitor compliance with a code of conduct where that body has:
- (a)
demonstrated its independence and expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority;
- (b)
established procedures which allow it to assess the eligibility of controllers and processors concerned to apply the code, to monitor their compliance with its provisions and to periodically review its operation;
- (c)
established procedures and structures to handle complaints about infringements of the code or the manner in which the code has been, or is being, implemented by a controller or processor, and to make those procedures and structures transparent to data subjects and the public; and
- (d)
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority that its tasks and duties do not result in a conflict of interests.
- (a)
- 3.
The competent supervisory authority shall submit the draft requirements for accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article to the Board pursuant to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.
- 4.
Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority and the provisions of Chapter VIII, a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, subject to appropriate safeguards, take appropriate action in cases of infringement of the code by a controller or processor, including suspension or exclusion of the controller or processor concerned from the code. It shall inform the competent supervisory authority of such actions and the reasons for taking them.
- 5.
The competent supervisory authority shall revoke the accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 if the requirements for accreditation are not, or are no longer, met or where actions taken by the body infringe this Regulation.
- 6.
This Article shall not apply to processing carried out by public authorities and bodies.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Article 41 new – paragraph 3
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 1294 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 1261–1564 to the draft report
Changes in context
RemovedAdded