Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 6b

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment

Source notes (1)
  • No Commission counterpart is printed for this Parliament-proposed recital.

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Additional proposed wording Amendment 112 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
Justification

The amendment is justified by the need to address fragmented access to in-vehicle data, functions and resources, which limits innovation and the competitiveness of the EU automotive sector. Improved access is necessary to enable the development and scaling of connected, autonomous and software-defined vehicle services.

Source: Joint Research Centre (2018), Access to digital car data and competition in aftersales services: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC112634