Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 53

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 3 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Commission source wording and instructions

Recital 53

Commission proposal

To ensure that the single-entry point enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Alternative wording Amendment 508 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(53) To ensure that the single-entry point enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions. Accordingly, ENISA, in cooperation with the Commission and the competent authorities, should establish a common framework for the type of information and the format of notifications, including technical guidelines, interfaces and transmission channels, reporting deadlines and update mechanisms. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonised for this purpose, Member States will inform ENISA about their national provisions, and ENISA, in consultation with the Commission, will ensure interoperability, adaptability to regulatory developments and compliance monitoring.
Alternative wording Amendment 509 · Michael McNamara, Irena Joveva, Sophie Wilmès, Oihane Agirregoitia Martínez, Bart Groothuis, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová ITRE · LIBE
(53) To ensure that the single-entry point enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions, and the Commission would be empowered to issue a delegated act to harmonize further.
Alternative wording Amendment 510 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(53) To ensure that the layered single-entry pointpoints structure enables the relevant entities to submit the type of information and the format required under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should consult the Commission and the competent authorities under those acts. Where a Union legal act is not fully harmonized regarding the type of information and the format of notifications, Member States should inform ENISA about their national provisions.