Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 2 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Recital 52
Commission proposal
To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Alternative wordingAmendment 135 · Victor Negrescu JURI
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems. Those measures should be aligned with state-of-the-art cybersecurity practices and ensure a high level of security by design and by default, including robust access control, encryption and logging, so that simplification of reporting does not create new vulnerabilities or weaken the protection of sensitive incident information.
Alternative wordingAmendment 506 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect with the single-entryEU entry point withthrough their national reporting systems.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Recital 52
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 506 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
Changes in context
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect with the single-entryEU entry point withthrough their national reporting systems.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems.
Amendment 506 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect with the EU entry point through their national reporting systems.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 135 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
Changes in context
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems. Those measures should be aligned with state-of-the-art cybersecurity practices and ensure a high level of security by design and by default, including robust access control, encryption and logging, so that simplification of reporting does not create new vulnerabilities or weaken the protection of sensitive incident information.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems.
Amendment 135 · JURI amendments 69–296 to the draft opinion
(52) To ensure the continuity and interoperability with existing national technical solutions that facilitate incident reporting, to the extent feasible, ENISA should take into account such national technical solutions when developing the specifications on the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point. Further, ENISA should consider technical protocols and tools such as application programming interfaces and machine-readable standards that enable entities to integrate reporting obligations into business processes, and authorities to connect the single-entry point with their national reporting systems. Those measures should be aligned with state-of-the-art cybersecurity practices and ensure a high level of security by design and by default, including robust access control, encryption and logging, so that simplification of reporting does not create new vulnerabilities or weaken the protection of sensitive incident information.
