Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 4 Parliament amendments
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to this tracked part. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Commission source wording and instructions
Recital 51
Commission proposal
Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to this tracked part.
Recital 51
May Presidency compromise
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation with the CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
June Presidency compromise · 10 June
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
June Presidency compromise · 18 June
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Recital 51
September Presidency compromise
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Recital 51 4 Council drafts
Recital 51
21 May 2026 · May Presidency compromise
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation with the CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
10 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 10 June
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
18 June 2026 · June Presidency compromise · 18 June
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Recital 51
3 September 2026 · September Presidency compromise
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.
Alternative wordingAmendment 26 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
Alternative wordingAmendment 503 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, including punitive measures for failure to comply with the provisions in force, followed by a reassessment by the Commission and notification of the respective reassessment measures to Parliament and the Council.
Alternative wordingAmendment 504 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
Alternative wordingAmendment 505 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entryEU entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entryEU entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entryEU entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.
Recital 51
European Commission proposal → Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
Changes in context
BeforeItenablingis important to support the notificationfurther harmonisation of incidents,incidentENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificitiesnotification and requirementsreporting,forincludingthebynotifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Basedworking on the resultsexchange and interoperability of theinformationpiloting,regardingtheincidentCommissionreporting.shouldForassessthisthe proper functioning, reliability, integritypurpose and confidentialityinofcooperationthe single-entry point. The Commission should consultwith the CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should takedevelopallguidelinesnecessarytocorrective measures, followed by a reassessment byfoster the Commissionharmonisation of incident notifications.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
European Commission proposal
Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation with the CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
Changes in context
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation with thewithhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 9547/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation with the CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Recital 51
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
Changes in context
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10426/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications.
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Recital 51
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26 → Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
Changes in context
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Council Presidency text · ST 10677/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Council Presidency text · ST 12535/26
It is important to support the further harmonisation of incident notification and reporting, including by working on the exchange and interoperability of information regarding incident reporting. For this purpose and in cooperation withhe CSIRTs network, the Cooperation Group and competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, ENISA should develop guidelines to foster the harmonisation of incident notifications .
Recital 51
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 503 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
Changes in context
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, including punitive measures for failure to comply with the provisions in force, followed by a reassessment by the Commission and notification of the respective reassessment measures to Parliament and the Council.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Amendment 503 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, including punitive measures for failure to comply with the provisions in force, followed by a reassessment by the Commission and notification of the respective reassessment measures to Parliament and the Council.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 504 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
Changes in context
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Amendment 504 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 505 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
Changes in context
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entryEU entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entryEU entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entryEU entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Amendment 505 · ITRE–LIBE amendments 401–526 to the draft report
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the EU entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the EU entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the EU entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
Wording reproduced in the amendment → Amendment 26 · IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
Changes in context
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
RemovedAdded
Both texts in full
Wording reproduced in the amendment
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures, followed by a reassessment by the Commission.
(51) Before enabling the notification of incidents, ENISA should pilot the functioning of the single-entry point which should include a thorough testing of the specificities and requirements for the notifications for the relevant Union legal acts. Based on the results of the piloting, the Commission should assess the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality of the single-entry point. The Commission should consult the CSIRTs network and the competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts, by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, when carrying out the assessment. Where the Commission finds that the single-entry point ensures the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality, it should publish a notice to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. In case the Commission considers that the proper functioning, reliability, integrity and confidentiality is not ensured, ENISA should take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay, followed by a reassessment by the Commission without undue delay.
