Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 50

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 5 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Commission source wording and instructions

Recital 50

Commission proposal

To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 50

May Presidency compromise

To ensure the security of national entry points in particular and with a view to design interoperable national entry points, ENISA should develop guidelines addressing the appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures for Member States to develop and maintain their respective national entry point . ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the national entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Political group at the amendment date where available; otherwise the current Parliament affiliation.

Alternative wording Amendment 25 IMCO draft opinion · Alex Agius Saliba (rapporteur)
(50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult and take utmost account of feedback from competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.
Alternative wording Amendment 498 · Bart Groothuis, Ivars Ijabs, Morten Løkkegaard, Nikola Minchev, Svenja Hahn, Andreas Glück, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Ana Vasconcelos ITRE · LIBE
(50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts. ENISA's role in the reporting process is limited to establishing and operating the single-entry point portal and routing reports to the competent CSIRT(s) without having access to the content of incident reports. Responsibility for the management and follow-up of incident reports remains with the national CSIRTs or competent authorities to which ENISA directs them.
Alternative wording Amendment 499 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point, including measures to protect against cyberattacks. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts, as well as providing for potential penalties in the event of failure to comply with the provisions on data protection and the potential dissemination of personal data without the consent of the persons in question.
Alternative wording Amendment 500 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(50) To ensure the security of the layered single-entry pointpoints structure, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the EU and national single-entry pointpoints and the information submitted or disseminated via the national single-entry points to the EU entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the layered single-entry pointpoints structure by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.
Alternative wording Amendment 501 · Elena Sancho Murillo, Marina Kaljurand, Brando Benifei, José Cepeda, Matthias Ecke, Lina Gálvez, Francisco Assis, Alex Agius Saliba ITRE · LIBE
(50) To ensure the security of the single-entry point, ENISA should take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the single-entry point and the information submitted or disseminated via the single-entry point. When assessing the risk, and the appropriateness and proportionality of those measures, ENISA should take into account the sensitivity of information submitted or disseminated pursuant to the relevant Union legal acts. ENISA should consult and take utmost account of feedback from competent authorities under the relevant Union legal acts when drafting the technical, operational and organisational measures necessary to establish, maintain and securely operate the single-entry point by making use of existing cooperation groups and networks of Member States established under these acts.