Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 49

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 4 Council drafts · 5 Parliament amendments

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

Commission source wording and instructions

Recital 49

Commission proposal

Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The single-entry point for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 49

May Presidency compromise

Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The establishment by Member States of a national entry point reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface at national level. Furthermore, the single-entry point established at national level should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Alternative wording Amendment 134 · Victor Negrescu JURI
(49) Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The single-entry point for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents. The design, documentation and guidance for the single-entry point should be clear, accessible and proportionate, in particular for SMEs, and should promote digital literacy and awareness of cybersecurity obligations among entities required to report incidents.
Alternative wording Amendment 187 · Sophia Kircher IMCO
(49) Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The single-entry point for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents. In implementing the single-entry point, due account should be taken of the ongoing implementation of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 in order to avoid the creation of overlapping or duplicative reporting obligations.
Alternative wording Amendment 492 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(49) Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The EU entry point and national single-entry pointpoints for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Member States should establish a single national entry point for the submission of those notifications. The competent national authorities should remain solely responsible for receiving, assessing and handling notifications. Information received through the national single entry points may be made available, where relevant and in accordance with applicable Union law, to ENISA for the purposes of situational awareness, trend analysis, risk monitoring and the identification of systemic vulnerabilities. Such cooperation should not affect the competences of national authorities nor the independence of supervisory authorities established under Union law. Furthermore, the layered single-entry pointpoints structure should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry pointpoints, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents.
Justification

Simplification for reporting entities does not justify transferring to a Union body competences exercised at national level. The single entry point must be national; ENISA's role is one of aggregation for situational awareness, not of substantive handling.

Alternative wording Amendment 493 · Markus Buchheit ITRE · LIBE
(49) Several horizontal or sectorialsectoral Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. TheIn single-entryorder pointto avoid unnecessary duplicate reporting, Member States should be able to provide for incidentnational reportingtechnical shouldsolutions allowor entitiesnational tocoordinating fulfilpoints reportingfor obligationsthe understructured Directiveonward (EU)transmission 2022/2555,of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submittingsuch notifications to a single interface. Furthermore,A theUnion single-entry point should givebe used only in a possibilitysupporting role for entitiesclearly tocross-border retrieveor informationUnion-wide thatsystemic theyincidents haveand previouslyshould submittedneither usingreplace thenor single-entryde point,facto therebydisplace helping entities to keep track of their compliance withnational reporting obligationschannels infor connectionpurely with specificnational incidents."
Alternative wording Amendment 494 · Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă ITRE · LIBE
(49) Several horizontal or sectorial Union legal acts require the notification of the same event to different authorities using different technical means and channels. The single-entry point for incident reporting should allow entities to fulfil reporting obligations under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2557 by submitting notifications to a single interface. Furthermore, the single-entry point should give a possibility for entities to retrieve information that they have previously submitted using the single-entry point, thereby helping entities to keep track of their compliance with reporting obligations in connection with specific incidents based on a legal certainty programme, without diverging national interpretations.