Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 43i
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment
Source notes (1)
- No Commission counterpart is printed for this Parliament-proposed recital.
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Additional proposed wording Amendment 410 · Marina Kaljurand, Elena Sancho Murillo, Brando Benifei, Birgit Sippel, Alex Agius Saliba, Francisco Assis, Elisabeth Grossmann, Kristian Vigenin, Matjaž Nemec ITRE · LIBE
The principles of data protection by design and by default should be taken into consideration regarding software placed on the market to enable electronic communication or to allow for the retrieval of information on the internet. This should entail that the most privacy protective settings should be enabled by default in accordance with Article 25 of this regulation to prevent the processing, including the storing, transmission and transfer of information already stored on the terminal equipment of a user, except where otherwise provided in Article 91c. At the time of installing the software the user should be offered different options allowing them to consent or to change the default privacy settings of the terminal equipment. Furthermore, the user should be offered different options to choose from to enable them to make an informed decision on whether or not to allow different processing activities, including but not limited to the storing and transmission of data. The user should be provided with understandable and easily to navigate language and settings, that should be adaptable and permit the user to revise the settings of their terminal equipment at any time. The user's choice should be communicated to other parties that should implement and enforce the user's choices and any updates thereof. Controllers should not design consent interfaces that could lead to the systematic overriding, undermining, or circumvention of automated and machine-readable indications. In the absence of an explicit affirmative action, consent should not be inferred from the default configuration of a browser or operating system, nor from the user’s practice of use of such tools.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.