Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 29a
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment
Source notes (1)
- No Commission counterpart is printed for this Parliament-proposed recital.
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Additional proposed wording Amendment 250 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
Reliance on legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) requires three cumulative conditions to be met: the pursuit by the controller or by a third party of an interest which is lawful, clearly and precisely articulated, and real and present rather than speculative; the necessity of the processing for that interest, which cannot reasonably be achieved by other means less intrusive for the data subject, including through the use of anonymised data; and the absence of an overriding of that interest by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject, having regard to the nature of the data, the context of the processing, its consequences, and the reasonable expectations of the data subject based on their relationship with the controller. Where those interests or rights would override the interest pursued, the controller may implement mitigating measures; where such measures are insufficient, the processing may not be based on that provision.
Justification
Codifies the three-condition test consistently applied by the Court and by the Board.
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.