Research

Digital Omnibus tracker

Digital Omnibus proposal

Recital 26b

Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.

Recital total: 1 part · 3 Council drafts · 1 Parliament amendment

Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.

Institutional text

European Commission proposal

The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.

No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.

Institutional text

Council Presidency texts

Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.

Recital 26b

June Presidency compromise · 10 June

The European Data Innovation Board’s character as a consultative body as regards the implementation and the enforcement of the Data Act should be maintained. However, its structure should be simplified and should allow for more strategic discussions. Notwithstanding these changes, the Board should continue to serve as a forum to develop consistent practice of competent authorities in the enforcement of Chapters II, III, V and VII, VIIa and VIIc. To this end, technical exchanges relating to best practices and dialogue between national enforcement bodies, including information sharing shall continue to be possible in various subgroups. These subgroups should also be able to discuss matters relating to the newly added Chapters VIIa and VIIc. The European Data Innovation Board should also be consulted on guidelines the Commission may issue to support the sectorial implementation of the Data Act.

Competing proposals

European Parliament amendments

These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.

More filters

Additional proposed wording Amendment 208 · Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Alexandre Varaut, Fabrice Leggeri, Marion Maréchal, António Tânger Corrêa, Christophe Bay ITRE · LIBE
(26b)

At the same time, certain closed or restricted data ecosystems contribute significantly to research and innovation, industrial resilience, technological sovereignty and crisis preparedness, while raising strategic considerations concerning switching, extraterritoriality, concentration and dependency. It is therefore appropriate to establish a voluntary registration framework for strategic data ecosystems, enabling structured exchanges with the European Data Innovation Board (EDIB) on governance, security, interoperability, transparency and the contribution of those ecosystems to Union objectives, and facilitating their participation, alongside data intermediation services and recognised data altruism organisations, in cross-sectoral dialogue and cooperation on best practices, interoperability, trust and accountability in the Union data economy.

Justification

Provides the political basis for the voluntary registration scheme introduced in the operative part. The voluntary character and the anchoring in the EDIB preserve flexibility while giving the Union visibility over critical data infrastructures, without creating a new obligation or a centralised gateway.