Digital Omnibus proposal
Recital 13a
Compare the available Commission, Council and Parliament texts and amendments affecting this recital.
Recital total: 1 part · 0 Council drafts · 3 Parliament amendments
Source notes (1)
- No Commission counterpart is printed for this Parliament-proposed recital.
Removed wording is struck through; added or replacement wording is highlighted.
Institutional text
European Commission proposal
The wording proposed by the Commission at the start of this legislative file.
No standalone Commission wording is mapped to these tracked parts. A newly proposed provision may have no earlier text of its own.
Institutional text
Council Presidency texts
Successive Presidency compromise texts. Their inclusion does not imply agreement or adoption.
No Council wording is mapped to these tracked parts.
Competing proposals
European Parliament amendments
These are alternative tabled amendments. An amendment affecting several tracked parts appears once here, with each target identified.
More filters
Additional proposed wording Amendment 147 · Dario Nardella ITRE · LIBE
Data generated through the use of connected products used in primary economic activities, such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture, simultaneously reflect the technical functioning of the product and the economic activity of the user. In the former respect, they may contain elements covered by the trade secrecy of the manufacturer or the service provider; in the latter respect, they constitute competitively sensitive information for the user, in that they reveal, among other things, processing times, quantities of inputs used, the geolocation of production units, actual yields and other operating parameters. The mechanism for refusing to share data protected as trade secrets with third-country entities, provided for in Articles 4(8) and 5(11) of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, as amended by this Regulation, should ensure that both aspects are protected. To that end, where a request for access concerns data that reflect the user’s economic activity, the data holder shall inform the user in advance of the request received and of the action it intends to take; the user shall have the right to request the triggering of the refusal mechanism in respect of the data relating to that user. The distinction between the technical dimension of the product and the dimension relating to the user’s economic activity may be the subject of guidance from the Commission, adopted after consulting organisations representing users in the relevant sectors.
Justification
Il considerando riconosce la natura duale dei dati generati da prodotti connessi impiegati nelle attività economiche primarie e stabilisce il principio secondo cui il meccanismo di rifiuto della condivisione verso paesi terzi tutela sia il fabbricante sia l'utente. Non altera la struttura fondamentale del regolamento (UE) 2023/2854 sulla titolarità dei dati (detentore dei dati - utente - terza parte), ma vincola l'esercizio del meccanismo di rifiuto a un obbligo informativo verso l'utente e riconosce a quest'ultimo la facoltà di richiedere l'attivazione del meccanismo per la parte di dati che riflettono la propria attività economica. Il considerando costituisce il fondamento interpretativo delle modifiche all'articolo 4, paragrafo 8, e all'articolo 5, paragrafo 11, introdotte dagli Emendamenti 6 e 7.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 148 · Paolo Inselvini, Francesco Torselli ITRE · LIBE
Data generated through the use of connected products used in primary economic activities, such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture, simultaneously reflect the technical functioning of the product and the economic activity of the user. In the former respect, they may contain elements covered by the trade secrecy of the manufacturer or the service provider; in the latter respect, they constitute competitively sensitive information for the user, in that they reveal, among other things, processing times, quantities of inputs used, the geolocation of production units, actual yields and other operating parameters. The mechanism for refusing to share data protected as trade secrets with third-country entities, provided for in Articles 4(8) and 5(11) of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, as amended by this Regulation, should ensure that both aspects are protected. To that end, where a request for access concerns data that reflect the user’s economic activity, the data holder shall inform the user in advance of the request received and of the action it intends to take; the user shall have the right to request the triggering of the refusal mechanism in respect of the data relating to that user. The distinction between the technical dimension of the product and the dimension relating to the user’s economic activity may be the subject of guidance from the Commission, adopted after consulting organisations representing users in the relevant sectors.
Additional proposed wording Amendment 149 · Bart Groothuis, Ivars Ijabs, Morten Løkkegaard, Nikola Minchev, Svenja Hahn, Andreas Glück, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Ana Vasconcelos ITRE · LIBE
Data which has undergone processing, transformation or aggregation involving the application of proprietary analytics, algorithms, or domain knowledge fall within the scope of data that may qualify for trade secret protection under Articles 4(6)-(8).
No amendments match these filters.
Selected texts
Compare wording
Choose a tracked part and a named pair of texts. Comparisons are offered only where both sides cover the same legal unit.
Select a specific tracked part above to compare wording.
No same-scope comparison is available for this tracked part. Its source wording remains available in the article text sections.